Software licenses are legally binding documents that provide guidelines for the use, modification, and distribution of software. Understanding software licenses is essential for a developer to make informed decisions when it comes to using and contributing to open source projects or creating proprietary software.
This article provides an overview of software licenses and the different types of licenses that a developer may encounter.
Types of Software Licenses
Public Domain License A public domain license (CC0) waives all rights to the software. If your project is in the public domain, that means it is not protected by any copyright laws and can be freely used, modified, and distributed.
Proprietary License Proprietary licenses restrict the distribution, modification, and use of software. The software owner usually maintains control over the source code, features, and usage of the software.
Open Source/Permissive License Open source licenses allow software to be used, modified, and shared without restrictions. They align with the specifications of the Open Source Definition. e.g. MIT license.
Copyleft License Copyleft licenses are designed to promote free software. “Free” in this context refers to the freedom to share and modify works. The most common one is the GNU General Public License (GPL). The GPL is similar to open source licenses, but it requires that any modifications or derived works be released under the same GPL license. This ensures that the software and its derivatives remain open source and accessible to the community.
Benefits of Software Licensing
A license grants permission so that you don’t have to do it for each individual user.
Licenses protect your intellectual property. They control how your software/source code can be used and prevent piracy.
Open Source Licenses
Open Source Initiative (OSI) has an exhaustive list of open source licenses. The most commonly used ones are highlighted below.
The MIT License
The MIT License grants permission to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the software under certain conditions.
The first condition is that the license text must be included in all copies or substantial portions of the software. This ensures that anyone using the software knows that it is licensed under the MIT License and is aware of the license terms.
The second condition is a disclaimer of liability, which means that the authors or copyright holders cannot be held responsible for any problems that may arise.
In summary, the MIT License is a permissive software license that allows users to do almost anything they want with the software, as long as they include the license text and do not hold the authors or copyright holders liable for any problems that may arise.
GNU General Public License (GPL)
The GNU General Public Licenses grant permission to use, modify or use pieces of the software in new programs, and distribute copies of the software. It requires that the source code is made available to users, and allows for commercial use and distribution of the software.
Unlike MIT, the GNU General Public License is a copyleft license, which means that distributed works based on the software are required to use the same license as the original. As a result of this, software licensed under the GPL cannot be used in paid or proprietary software. However, the Lesser General Public License exists for this purpose.
GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL)
The GNU Lesser General Public License is similar to the GPL, but without certain restrictions. It allows users to modify and distribute the software without adopting a GNU License, allowing it to be used in proprietary software.
Apache License (Apache-2.0)
The Apache License is a permissive license that grants individuals and organizations permission to freely use, modify, and distribute software.
An interesting feature of the Apache License is its patent clause. This clause grants users the right to use any patents that the contributors to the software may hold. This can be helpful if you are using the software for commercial purposes, as it can help protect you from patent infringement claims.
Like most open source licenses, The Apache License also contains a disclaimer of warranties and limitations of liability. This means that the software is provided “as is” and that the original creators of the software cannot be held responsible for any damages that may result from using the software
If you create a derivative work based on software licensed under the Apache License, you must include a copy of the Apache License in the new work and retain any copyright, patent, and trademark notices that were included in the original software. You must also clearly indicate any modifications that you made to the original work, and include attribution notices to give credit to the original creators of the software.
Overall, the Apache License is a flexible and permissive license that allows for broad use of open-source software, while also providing some protections for both users and contributors.
BSD License
The BSD license allows users to modify, distribute, and use the licensed software without any restrictions on the licenses of derivative works.
The BSD License comes in two forms: the two-clause BSD license and the three-clause BSD license. The two-clause BSD license only contains a copyright notice and a disclaimer of warranties, while the three-clause BSD license adds an additional clause that requires users to include attribution notices in derivative works.
Similar to other open-source licenses, such as the Apache License, the BSD License contains a disclaimer of warranties and limitations of liability.
Overall, the BSD License is a popular choice for open-source projects that value flexibility and minimal restrictions on the use and distribution of their software. However, it may not be the best choice for projects that require stronger protections for their intellectual property.
Mozilla Public License (MPL)
The Mozilla Public License (MPL) is a permissive open-source license that allows users to modify, distribute and use the licensed software without any restrictions on the licenses of derivative works. It is also a copyleft license, as it requires that any derivative works include a copy of the MPL and retain any copyright, patent, and trademark notices.
The MPL also contains a patent license clause that provides users with the right to use any patents that a contributor to the software may own. The license has a disclaimer of warranties and limitations of liability, similar to other open-source licenses.
One drawback of the MPL is that it may be less compatible with other open-source licenses than some of the more permissive licenses, such as the MIT or Apache Licenses. This can limit the potential for collaboration between projects that use different licenses. However, the MPL is still a widely used open-source license and is particularly popular for software projects with a strong focus on community development and collaboration.
Proprietary Licenses
Some common types of proprietary software licenses are highlighted below.
End User License Agreement (EULA)
An End User License Agreement (EULA) is a legally binding contract between the user and the software owner, which defines the terms and conditions under which the software can be used. Lots of companies make use of EULAs. For example, Microsoft uses an EULA for Windows.
The EULA restricts the user from modifying the software, distributing it without permission, or using it in certain ways.
An EULA must be clear and concise. It must contain the following information:
Copyright notice
Infringement acknowledgment
Licensor information
Software information
Relevant laws
Warranty Disclaimer
Restrictions for use
Site licenses
Start date
Termination of licensing
License granting
For a sample, try this free EULA generator.
Perpetual License
A perpetual license is an old model of licensing that permits users to use the software indefinitely, after a one-time payment. The license holder has access to that specific version of the software indefinitely. This model is being phased out in favor of subscription-based license models because it does not account for updates and patches, just a one-time revenue hit, which makes it problematic for software owners and end users. It was popular in the early days when you purchased a program by buying a disk with a built-in license.
AutoCAD (a design software) used to have a perpetual license, but has moved to a subscription license.
Subscription License
Software has evolved from being perceived as products to Software as a Service (SaaS), and the subscription license model has taken over. It involves paying a regular fee (monthly, annually, or otherwise) to use software, as opposed to a one-time purchase.
Subscription licenses offer benefits such as updates and flexibility. With a subscription license, you can offer different tiers of service, and users can choose what meets their needs. Your users can also upgrade or downgrade their subscription based on their changing requirements, reflecting the adaptability needed in today’s dynamic world.
Subscription-based licenses eliminate the need for a significant upfront investment as opposed to perpetual licenses. Budgeting becomes easier with regular smaller payments compared to a large one-time payment. Maintenance, upgrades, and renewals are typically included in the subscription cost, unlike perpetual licenses which may require additional expenses as warranties expire. A lot of modern software uses subscription licenses, e.g. Adobe Creative Suite.
Floating License
A science club requests to use your library for research, and you approve their request on one condition- only one person can be granted access at any given time. Since all 5 members do not need to use the library at the same time, they have gladly accepted your offer. This is essentially how a floating license works.
A floating license grants a group of users shared access to your software. This means that the software can be installed on a network of computers, allowing access to multiple users. The downside for users is that if the floating license is for 2 users and 2 people are currently using the software, a third user would have to wait. Adobe Creative Cloud offers floating licenses for schools.
Choosing a License
Choosing the right license for your project is essential. Here are some factors to consider when navigating this process.
Project Goals
Examine the goals of your project. Think about how you want it to be If you want to generate revenue from the project and have control over its usage, proprietary licenses might be the way to go. Open source licenses are ideal for fostering community involvement and collaboration.Community and Support Consider the existing community and support surrounding various licenses. Open source licenses often come with communities offering assistance, comprehensive documentation, and opportunities for collaborative contributions. This support can be invaluable, providing guidance and fostering growth.
Openness
When considering a license, contemplate the level of freedom you want to grant your users. Open source licenses encourage collaboration and the sharing of knowledge, while proprietary licenses grant you greater control over your software. Note that Open Source software does not automatically mean free software (”free” in this context is referring to price).Compatibility
Think about any obligations you have, such as licensing requirements from third-party libraries or components governed by specific licenses. Ensure compatibility between licenses to avoid conflicts or legal issues. For example, if you’re using a third-party library with a GNU GPL, your project cannot have a proprietary license.Legal Requirements While not the most exciting aspect, legal requirements are crucial. Take the time to acquaint yourself with the legal implications and obligations associated with different licenses. Complying with license terms helps avoid legal pitfalls and ensures a smooth development process.
Conclusion
In conclusion, understanding software licenses is vital for developers. It allows you to make informed decisions about how your software can be used, modified, and distributed. It is essential to consider factors like project goals, community support, openness, compatibility, and legal requirements when choosing a license for your project. By navigating the licensing landscape effectively, you can make the best choice for your project.